Three years back there was a real movement aboutbeing mean in relationships because people of low
self esteem expected it, and it was especially aimed
at women. At the time I was teaching an
undergrad psych class, that's a scary thought isn't it;
and actually brought some of these CD's into class
to let them listen to this mess.Well, it was just that,
and I really felt it was so demeaning, only
here is the problem; the techniques do work.
That's a problem because they are techniques,
not who you are, but something that you do.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_o4RLQ3DIqw
Sort of like when people write about stuff just
because they need to be writing another article
so they will get paid? Kind of like when the
Cheesey nature of modern publishing forcesthose who actually do have talent to become
"more productive," meaning, "put out more
articles or else."
Then people wonder where the genius writers
of the past went, here's an answer- they didn't go anywhere.
Capitalist pig editor's (CPE's) tethered them to a
machine for bucks! They just have to eat like
everyone else- but while those CPE's received
raise on top of raise on top of raise, the writers
who put them there, didn't. They have to write for a living, and
CPE's demand; sometimes, way too much of it for them to survive.
So what do you want reader, quality, or quantity, because, here
is an odd fact, when it comes to writing and the pace of the
human performing it, you can't get both; and today, we
stack on top of that video. We expect our leaders and those
who contribute to our niche's to produce not only top notch
writing but also, top notch multi-media, and when they don't,
we blithely pass them off. Want to know what happens when
really good writers get treated like that? So then who do you
end up reading- you end up reading who corporate controlled
editorship wants you to read, because you brought that on,
because you did not choose your favorite local writers and
see to it that they got paid commensurate with their art.
Is there an answer for us as readers, certainly in the case
of my favorites, usually I try to purchase at least one if
not two of their articles or books per month; why(?), if
only so that, if everyone else did that, they'd have a
reasonably good month? Folks this isn't easy to say, and
it's not about me, this about the writers that are good;
that share with me, with us, those talents.
And how, because times are tough
right now, they are, many times, a low priority- and
we don't think of art, usually; as much as we think of
Milk? Groceries take a priority over art, and that's
almost natural, isn't it?
Love isn't natural, love is better; natural is to drink the
Milk, and the priority for survival gets met, love says,
"hey, we can drink one less glass a day, put that
two dollars back, and buy one of Ned's articles."
That isn't natural, but it is, love. Love is better, and
this article has suggested by some illustrations from
life, why that is so, why love is better. Now the
real question becomes, do you agree and will you
act upon that? Or do you disagree and will you
act upon that? Take a stand, and when you do,
you will find why love is better.
Great FREE Software Site- Try This You Will Love It - I Did
